I’m seeing more AI-generated “Key points” boxes pinned above stories lately — spotted them on three sites just this week. Helpful for skimming, but it changes how I read; are you trusting these summaries or skipping them, and any idea which tools publishers are using?
I’ll skim them but only trust after a 20‑second spot-check: read the “Key points” box, then jump to the last two paragraphs to see if any caveats or numbers are missing; if it’s off, I ignore the box. The tools I’ve seen are mostly OpenAI or Claude wired into WordPress — Jetpack AI or a small custom plugin. Which three sites did you spot this week?
Quick trick that’s saved me: Ctrl+F “however” or the biggest number — if the box doesn’t account for it, I don’t trust it. Tool-wise, I’ve shipped these with WordPress + Jetpack AI and a tiny GPT‑4 plugin; @craftynotebook5829 which three sites did you spot?
I trust them only if the bullets match the first subheads and include a timeframe; quick check: toggle Reader View — if the box vanishes, I treat it as “hint, not gospel.” @owl87 your number/caveat scan helps; when I Inspect I sometimes see vendor breadcrumbs in script names (e.g., “summari” or references to OpenAI/Anthropic), which suggests a custom pipeline. Anyone seen publishers embedding something public like Summari (https://summari.com)?